!!! DESIGNING A GROTESQUE EXPERIENCE !!!
A lot has happened since my last post on this blog. The game has changed its working title to Mind Scanners, it has been re-designed, put into a new setting and the artstyle is completely different!
See the new version here.
See the new version here.
BUT this radiophone broadcast will not be about that - this blog post will describe the development of the first version way back in April 2018. This post will tell the story of making this game:
House of Lunacy. Our first attempt of making a psychotherapy simulator.
After making two iterations of the game which did not work, we looked at our budget and saw that we only had one month left. So we needed to make a quick design decision and focus on what worked.
The setting went back to the turn of the century private asylum.
The player was now able to commit up to three patients, and these would influence each other. Catty would lie about the other patients, Hendrick would eat the other patient's food and Damon would make death threats.
Our biggest design problem was how to design the choice of playing evil/good. We decided to have two different ways of treating the patients: an evil quick and dirty treatment and a slow, complicated and good treatment.
The three patients in the prototype needed a treatment for lying, over-consumption and a foul mouth. All symptoms concerned the mouth. The evil treatment was a grotesque surgical removal of their tongue. We talked a lot about the level of violence/gore of the game, and decided to go take the gore to the max and see what it did for the game.
Evil treatment |
The good treatment (shown below) was more abstract - a sci-fi machine that removed the patient's symptom with light. In this treatment, the Radiophone dictated what buttons the player should push (like the game Spaceteam).
Good treatment |
We wanted the player to work hard for being good, so the good treatment required a higher skillset and more resources. Too many games gives the player a choice of being good or evil, by a simple yes/no choice - but in reality, this is just choosing two different story paths. We want the good and evil to emerge from the player. By making the good path more difficult, the player must make a sacrifice to play good, and earn his/her status as "the hero".
For the artstyle I went for a high-res handrawn and skewed 2D style. The colors where dark and monotone, except the bright orange. Idea taken from Gideon Kiefer - our first reference.
Art style with orange as the only vivid color |
Gideon Kiefer |
As we needed to put some pressure on the player, we added action points and some management gameplay. Instead of going for a tycoon game (which would be a whole game in itself) we designed small "tasks" which required resources. To "Study", the player spent 1 action point in exchange for 1 XP. To "experiment" the player spent 1 action point, some money and risked the life of a patient to receive 10 XP. The level of XP would then unlock new treatments, story etc.
Management tasks |
We even managed to add the feature of restraints. If the patiens got stressed, their symptoms would go up a notch, and become more difficult to handle. The player could avoid this by either putting a straight jacket on the patient, throwing the patient in a padded cell or drugging the patient. Drugging the patient would even make them drug addicts..
Restraints feature |
Story encounters has always been an important mechanic in these kind of games. We wanted to let the player explore the house and have story encounters.
Exploring the house - story encounters. |
When development time ran out, we had a playable prototype. All in all, the concept was great and the game actually worked. But there was this feeling that it still wasn't there..
The game was unnecessarily complicated and it felt too dark and depressing. And once again.. the main gameplay was a bit neglected. The examination of the patient was boiled down to a big chunk of text and the treatment was.. interesting, surely, but not fun to play. Damn it.
I can't say this enough times. A psychotherapy simulator is such a complicated thing to design!
The final game probably seems like it was designed in a week, but the road to that design has been.. crazy. There, I said it.
Fortunately we learned a lot while working on this prototype and the result made it much easier to test our game design theories and work out our next step. But when was the next step?
The prototype was done and we had no more money, so Jesper had to jump to his other job to work full-time.
I decided spent a month more on the game, preparing it for publishers, investors and applying for a new round of cultural funding. The next Radiophone Broadcast will be about that month (may 2018): business, social media and pitching for publishers.
Thank you and see you next time!
-Malte
No comments:
Post a Comment